Case 2402294/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Golling v Staffline Recruitment Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402294/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N Golling
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 March 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr Golling an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why his claims should not be struck out because they were not being actively pursued. He did not reply to that letter.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 03 to 06 May 2022 would not consider Mr Golling's claim. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims were made, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agency worker regulations | The Tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 24 March 2021 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not reply. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 24 March 2021 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not reply. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.