Case 2402314/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Chadwick v Thomas Dornan (Printers) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402314/2020
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Chadwick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr P Chadwick against Thomas Dornan (Printers) Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages, awarding the claimant the gross sum of £73.51.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered damages of £423. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, awarding £169.24.
Finally, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars in breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, it awarded the claimant £846 in respect of that failure. The combined monetary awards totalled £1,511.75.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £73.51. | Upheld | — | £74 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £423. | Upheld | — | £423 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £169.24. | Upheld | — | £169 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to give the claimant a statement of employment particulars in breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, ordered an award of £846. | Upheld | — | £846 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,512
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.