Case 2402337/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Tallant v Suitebox UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402337/2020
- Decision date
- 22 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Tallant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records three successful claims by Mr S Tallant against Suitebox UK Limited. First, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The award on that claim was the gross sum of £9,588.09, after taking into account deductions that the claimant identified as sums the company was entitled to make.
Second, the tribunal found that expenses had not been paid in breach of contract and ordered damages of £41.34. Third, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £6,346.15.
The judgment contains only the disposal and the monetary orders, and does not set out any further reasons or factual findings beyond those recorded in the numbered paragraphs. The combined amount ordered by the tribunal was £15,975.58.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders payment of the gross sum of £9,588.09, after taking into account deductions identified by the claimant as those the company was entitled to make. | Upheld | — | £9,588 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that expenses were not paid in breach of contract and orders damages of £41.34. | Upheld | — | £41 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of the gross sum of £6,346.15. | Upheld | — | £6,346 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,976
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.