Case 2402338/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Davies v Gazulu Taxi Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402338/2021
- Decision date
- 4 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 22 March 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of part of the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Mrs C Davies was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,170. The respondent was ordered to pay that amount.
The judgment notice attached to the decision explains the general interest regime under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 and records the relevant decision day and calculation day, but the judgment itself does not set out any separate interest figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,170. | Upheld | — | £4,170 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,170
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.