Case 2402341/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bray v G & M Supplies (Cumbria) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402341/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a valid response in time. The tribunal therefore determined the claimant's claims on the material before it and found in his favour on four heads: holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, unlawful deduction from wages, breach of contract/notice pay, and redundancy pay.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that 90 hours of untaken but accrued holiday remained unpaid. It applied the claimant's hourly rate of £8.21 and awarded £738.90 gross. On wages, it found unauthorised deductions for December 2019 and January 2020. The judgment records December 2019 wages due of £1,334.31, less £710 paid, leaving £624.13, and January 2020 wages due of £1,334.31 with nothing paid, leaving £1,334.31, for total deductions of £1,958.44 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed without notice and awarded notice pay as damages for breach of contract. The text says he was entitled to one week's notice pay, but the calculation given is '3 weeks notice at £308.88 per week gross £923.64'. The award was therefore recorded as £923.64 gross, with tax and national insurance to be deducted and accounted for by the respondent.
Finally, the tribunal found the redundancy payment claim well-founded. It recorded that the claimant had been employed from 3 May 1996 until dismissal on 3 February 2020, was aged 50, and had a weekly gross wage of £307.88. Using a redundancy entitlement of 4.5 weeks, it awarded £1,385.46. The total of the sums awarded was £5,006.44 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Failure to pay holiday pay under regulation 14(2) or regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was found well-founded in respect of 90 hours untaken but accrued holiday at £8.21 per hour. | Upheld | — | £739 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for December 2019 and January 2020, totalling £1,958.44 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,958 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was dismissed without notice and the judgment awards notice pay as damages. The text says he was entitled to one week's notice pay, but the calculation given is '3 weeks notice at £308.88 per week gross £923.64', so the notice-period wording is inconsistent. | Upheld | — | £924 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the redundancy payment claim well-founded and calculated entitlement by reference to the claimant's employment from 3 May 1996 to dismissal on 3 February 2020, age 50, and weekly gross wage of £307.88. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,006
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.