Case 2402367/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Pavlova v HC Facility Management Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402367/2021
- Decision date
- 9 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Pavlova
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that HC Facility Management Limited was in administration. It found that neither the administrator's consent nor the court's permission had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 4 October 2022 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
For those reasons, the claim was struck out by Employment Judge Ainscough on 8 December 2022, with the judgment sent to the parties on 9 December 2022. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out. The reasons stated that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the consent of the administrator nor permission of the court had been obtained as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. The tribunal also noted that, after an opportunity on 4 October 2022 to give written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued, the claimant did not give an acceptable reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.