Case 2402367/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Devlin v Dcb Group Estates Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402367/2025
- Decision date
- 29 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Devlin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 29 May 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge KM Ross determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£97.68 gross) and had failed to pay accrued but untaken annual leave on termination (£426.13 gross). The respondent had separately paid £126.20 to the claimant on 22 July 2025.
The headline sums totalled £523.81; the tribunal credited the £126.20 already paid and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £397.61 in total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 default judgment; gross sum awarded for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £98 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave on termination; gross sum. | Upheld | — | £426 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £398
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.