Case 2402370/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Rigby v KKC FACILITIES Management UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402370/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Representatives
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Rigby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 July 2019 at Manchester, Employment Judge Holmes recorded a consent judgment in which the parties agreed that KKC FACILITIES Management UK Ltd would pay Mr L Rigby £300 by 31 July 2019. The payment was to be made gross through payroll and was subject to the necessary deductions for tax and national insurance.
The agreement was stated to be in full and final settlement of the claimant’s claims against the respondent in the proceedings, and of any claims the respondent may have against the claimant. The proceedings were stayed for implementation of those terms until 2 August 2019, when, with the claimant’s consent, the claims would stand dismissed upon withdrawal by him. The judgment records no findings on the merits or liability.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a consent settlement and does not state the underlying claim type; this classification is inferred from the case listing. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records a consent settlement and does not state the underlying claim type; this classification is inferred from the case listing. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.