Case 2402372/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Jackson v Wellington Inn Preston Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402372/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Jackson's claim that she was automatically unfairly dismissed for asserting a statutory right, said to be requesting payslips, was found not well-founded and failed.
The tribunal found that the claimant was an employee. On that basis, it upheld her claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination and awarded £270.93. It also upheld her unpaid wages claim in part and awarded £106.73 for 13 hours at £8.21, together with £113.10 made up of £94.25 and £18.85 statutory sick pay.
The tribunal further upheld the claim for notice pay and awarded £213.46, described as one week's pay. It also found a failure to provide written particulars of employment and awarded £426.92, described as two weeks' pay. The total payable by the respondent was £1,131.14 within 14 days of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim based on asserting a statutory right by requesting payslips. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination succeeded; award of 33 hours at £8.21. | Upheld | — | £271 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages claim succeeded in part; award comprised £106.73 for 13 hours at £8.21 and £113.10, the latter including £94.25 plus £18.85 statutory sick pay. | Upheld | — | £220 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded; award of one week's pay at £8.21 for 26 hours. | Upheld | — | £213 |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars of employment; award of two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £427 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,131
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.