Case 2402378/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D OGDEN v Rock Chemicals Limited T/a Rock Oil Company — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402378/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cronshaw Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D OGDEN
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Ogden, brought a bonus-related claim described in the judgment as an unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract. The hearing was held remotely by video on 27 November 2020 before Employment Judge Cronshaw sitting alone.
The tribunal recorded that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out separate detailed reasons, because the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were requested.
No monetary award was made because the claim failed. The judgment was sent to the parties on 3 December 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records the claim as an unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract (bonus) and dismisses it as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records the claim as an unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract (bonus) and dismisses it as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.