Mr C Sandor v Bright HR Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2402386/2024
Decision date: 6 August 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Phil Allen

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Sandor

Respondent

Bright HR Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dealt only with the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint in this judgment. It recorded that Mr C Sandor had been employed by Bright HR Limited for less than two years, so he did not meet the qualifying service requirement in section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for bringing an unfair dismissal claim.

The tribunal also found that the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. On that basis, the complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out.

The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required two years' service for an unfair dismissal complaint, and that the claimant had been employed for less than two years. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.