Case 2402387/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Leck v Mawson Energy Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402387/2023
- Decision date
- 28 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Leck
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Johnson in favour of Mr S Leck against Mawson Energy Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay £1,820.00 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,150.00 net as damages. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,120.00 gross.
The judgment does not set out any separate compensatory, basic, or interest calculation figures in the dispositive terms. The combined monetary awards total £5,090.00, and the written notice states that statutory interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 may apply if the sums are not paid within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,820.00. | Upheld | — | £1,820 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of damages in the net sum of £2,150.00. | Upheld | — | £2,150 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,120.00; the judgment does not use the phrase 'holiday pay' expressly. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,090
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.