Case 2402389/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Hickman v Advance Laser Aesthetics Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402389/2022
- Decision date
- 13 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Hickman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal made findings on the claim without a contested hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 1 November 2022.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £570.24 for February 2022. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,853.28 as notice damages, calculated by reference to 13 weeks at 16 hours per week at £8.91 per hour.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,211.76. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £166.08, calculated by reference to 2.33 untaken days, or 18.64 hours, at £8.91 per hour. The total monetary award set out in the decision was £3,801.36.
The separate notice on interest stated that interest was payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, article 12, at 8% per annum from the relevant decision day if the sums were not paid within 14 days, but the judgment itself did not quantify any interest amount.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for February 2022, calculated as 64 hours x £8.91 per hour. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, calculated as 13 weeks at 16 hours per week (208 hours) x £8.91. | Upheld | — | £1,853 |
| Redundancy | Dismissal by reason of redundancy; statutory redundancy payment calculated from 6 full years at one week's pay and 5 years at half a week's pay, using weekly pay of £142.56. | Upheld | — | £1,212 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement, calculated as 2.33 untaken days equating to 18.64 hours x £8.91 per hour. | Upheld | — | £166 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,801
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.