Case 2402396/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Pindy Akhtar v Retail Facility Solutions UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402396/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Pindy Akhtar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Tobin, recorded that it had no jurisdiction in respect of the claimant's claims. The judgment states that this was identified and explained in the Case Management Summary dated 12 September 2024.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claimant's claims for False Accusation and Data Protection Breach. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made in the judgment.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 16 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal recorded that it had no jurisdiction, as identified and with reasons given in the Case Management Summary dated 12 September 2024, and struck out the claimant's claims for False Accusation and Data Protection Breach. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal recorded that it had no jurisdiction, as identified and with reasons given in the Case Management Summary dated 12 September 2024, and struck out the claimant's claims for False Accusation and Data Protection Breach. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.