Case 2402397/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mullen v J McLaughlin Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402397/2022
- Decision date
- 29 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr D Mullen's claim against J McLaughlin Group Ltd. It found that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The Tribunal had previously given the claimant an opportunity on 9 July 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant objected to strike-out, but the Tribunal said the reasons given did not override the fact that the respondent no longer existed.
On that basis, the Tribunal concluded there was no legal or rational reason for the proceedings to continue and struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved and the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies. The claimant objected to strike-out, but the Tribunal held there was no legal or rational reason for the proceedings to continue. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.