Case 2402399/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Petruzzelli v Pilgrim’s Pride Limited (previously Tulip Limited) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402399/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Petruzzelli
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool by CVP on 16 and 17 November and 11 December 2020 before Employment Judge Benson sitting alone. The claimant was Mr M Petruzzelli. The respondent was initially named as Pilgrim’s Pride Limited (previously Tulip Limited), and the judgment records that the respondent’s name was amended to Pilgrim’s Pride Limited.
The written judgment states only that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. No written reasons are set out in the record supplied. The notes record that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim failed. The notes state that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.