Case 2402399/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Walker v BP Franchising Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402399/2022
- Decision date
- 17 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the matter under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen determined the claim without a hearing and found that BP Franchising Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mrs N Walker the gross sum of £673.05. The listed hearing on 1 July 2022 was cancelled. The judgment also included the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but it did not set out any separate interest amount in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a determination under Rule 21. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £673.05. | Upheld | — | £673 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £673
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.