Case 2402402/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Corbishley v Eco Measures Marketing Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402402/2022
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Corbishley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent filed a response acknowledging that payments were due and did not contest the claim. The Employment Judge therefore determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered Eco Measures Marketing Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) to pay Mr G Corbishley the net sum due of £2,635.02. The listed hearing on 17 January 2023 was cancelled as a result of the rule 21 determination.
The judgment was accompanied by the standard interest notice explaining that interest may be payable if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but no separate interest sum was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent's response acknowledged that payments were due and the claim was not contested. | Upheld | — | £2,635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,635
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.