Case 2402412/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Sarah Anderton v Fanco Limited T/A 365 Medi Care Homecare Manchester South — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402412/2024
- Decision date
- 2 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sarah Anderton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant suffered an unauthorised deduction from pay and that the unauthorised deductions claim was well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay GBP250 net to compensate the claimant for financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deduction.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had been paid her full holiday entitlement, including in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and dismissed the holiday pay complaint. It also dismissed the wrongful dismissal notice pay claim, finding that the claimant resigned without giving notice on 2 February 2024, and dismissed the claim for other payments.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the unauthorised deductions claim was well-founded and awards GBP250 net for financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deduction. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the claimant was paid her full holiday entitlement and the holiday pay complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a wrongful dismissal notice pay claim and states it was not well-founded because the claimant resigned without giving notice on 2 February 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states the claimant's claim for other payments is dismissed, without further detail in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.