Case 2402416/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Culshaw - Solicitor For the first and second v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402416/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mr Q Colborn, Ms S J Ensell
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr B Culshaw - Solicitor For the first and second
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 13 January 2020 before Employment Judge A M Buchanan, sitting with lay members Mr Q Colborn and Ms S J Ensell. The parties informed the tribunal that they had reached terms of settlement in the matter. The tribunal therefore adjourned the hearing to allow those terms to be implemented.
The judgment did not include any findings on liability for the listed claims. Instead, it provided that if no party applied by 4pm on 23 February 2020 to restore the case to the hearing list, and with the claimant's consent given on the day, the case would be treated as having been withdrawn on settlement and would stand dismissed on that basis without further order. No remedy was awarded or quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the parties had reached terms of settlement and adjourned the hearing to implement them. It gave a contingent order that, if the case was not restored by 23 February 2020, it would be treated as withdrawn on settlement and dismissed. No merits findings were made. | Settled | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records settlement only and does not determine liability on the merits. It states the case would be treated as withdrawn on settlement and dismissed if not restored by 23 February 2020. | Settled | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records settlement only and no substantive findings on this claim. The tribunal adjourned the hearing for implementation of the settlement terms and set a contingent withdrawal/dismissal date if no restoration application was made. | Settled | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.