Case 2402418/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Bussy v AA Healthways Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402418/2024
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Bussy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal preferred the claimant's account of the start and end of employment. It found that employment began on 15 August 2023, not 1 September 2023, because August 2023 messages showed the claimant already doing work for the respondent. It also found that, on 7 February 2024, the claimant was told she would not be paid after the end of February because the respondent could not afford it, and that she remained employed until 29 February 2024. The P45 date and the history of late wage payments were treated as more consistent with that account than with the respondent's case that employment ended on 30 January 2024.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was employed during February 2024 but was not paid for that month. It found an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,083. The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to 4 weeks' notice and that the respondent breached contract by ending employment without the full notice period, but no damages were awarded because the claimant said she did not seek notice damages if her wages and holiday claims succeeded.
The tribunal further found that the September 2023 payment covered work done in August and September, so the 10 working days holiday taken in September was not paid leave. It found that the claimant had only taken paid leave on Christmas Day, Boxing Day and New Year's Day. Applying the contract's holiday accrual calculation, and using weekly pay of £711.54 and a daily equivalent of £142.31, the tribunal found 12 days of accrued but untaken holiday remained due and awarded £1,707.72 gross for that holiday pay element.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for February 2024 (1-29 February); tribunal found the claimant remained employed until 29 February 2024 and was not paid for that month. | Upheld | — | £3,083 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid accrued holiday on termination; tribunal found the claimant had 12 days' paid leave outstanding and awarded the gross sum calculated from weekly pay of £711.54 and a daily rate of £142.31. | Upheld | — | £1,708 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to give 4 weeks' notice; tribunal found a contractual breach but made no damages award because the claimant said she did not seek notice damages if her wage and holiday claims succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,791
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.