Case 2402427/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Green Mr W Richards v Fairhome Property Investments Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402427/2019
- Decision date
- 24 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Green Mr W Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester on 16 April 2019 before Employment Judge Sherratt, the claimants' applications for interim relief were dismissed on withdrawal. The written record was sent to the parties on 24 April 2019, and the judgment notes that oral reasons had been given at the hearing. This decision does not determine the underlying substantive claims.
The tribunal ordered Mr Green to pay the respondent £10,000 and Mr Richards to pay the respondent £5,000, each as a contribution to the respondent's costs incurred while legally represented. The total monetary orders recorded in this decision were therefore £15,000.
The parties were noted to have agreed that the claims would need to be listed over three days, and they were directed to write to the tribunal by 3 May 2019 with proposed case management orders and dates to be avoided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Mr Green's interim relief application was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal ordered him to pay the respondent £10,000 as a contribution to costs incurred while legally represented. | Withdrawn | — | £10,000 |
| Other | Mr Richards's interim relief application was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal ordered him to pay the respondent £5,000 as a contribution to costs incurred while legally represented. | Withdrawn | — | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.