Case 2402429/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Broderick v Recruitment Panda Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402429/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Broderick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 1 August 2022, the Tribunal gave Recruitment Panda Limited an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why its counterclaim should not be struck out for lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mrs R Broderick, had not brought a breach of contract claim, so the respondent's counterclaim could not proceed on that basis.
The respondent did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the respondent's counterclaim. No remedy or monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The respondent's counterclaim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction because the claimant had not brought a breach of contract claim. The respondent did not make written representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 1 August 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.