Miss J Nelson v CRD Events Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2402436/2024
Decision date: 25 November 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge McDonald

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss J Nelson

Respondent

CRD Events Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded a single claim brought by Miss J Nelson against CRD Events Limited and struck it out. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.

By a letter dated 25 October 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment states that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

On that basis, Employment Judge McDonald ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability or any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 25 October 2024 to make representations or request a hearing about strike-out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant did not make representations or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.