Case 2402441/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Kamal Hamad v SIP Car Parks — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402441/2022
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kamal Hamad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cline, sitting alone in Manchester on 9 February 2023, found the claimant's breach of contract claim well-founded and ordered SIP Car Parks (1) Limited to pay £800 gross in unpaid notice pay. The tribunal also found the unlawful deductions from wages claim well-founded in part and awarded £88.12, made up of £75 for various expenses and £13.12 for reimbursement of vehicle insurance premiums.
The tribunal dismissed the claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay as not well-founded. The written record also included the standard notice under article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that if the sums were not paid within 14 days of the written record being sent, interest would accrue from 25 February 2023 at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim well-founded and ordered unpaid notice pay of £800 gross. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded in part. The award of £88.12 comprised £75 for various expenses and £13.12 for reimbursement of vehicle insurance premiums. | Upheld | — | £88 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment grouped this with the claim for unpaid wages and stated that the claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay were not well-founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment grouped this with unpaid wages and stated that the claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay were not well-founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £888
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.