Case 2402446/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Respondent: Case No: 2402446/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS G Woodhead Northern Leather Limited JUDGMENT 1. Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – v Northern Leather Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402446/2024
- Decision date
- 13 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Respondent: Case No: 2402446/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS G Woodhead Northern Leather Limited JUDGMENT 1. Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 –
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge M Butler on 8 August 2024 and sent to the parties on 13 August 2024. The tribunal found that the respondent, Northern Leather Limited, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £957.99 (comprising £687.72 plus a shortfall of £270.27).
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £763.29. The respondent was also ordered to pay £458.48 in respect of unpaid holiday entitlement.
The judgment is brief and does not set out detailed reasoning, reflecting its issue under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. A notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, setting the relevant decision day as 13 August 2024 and the calculation day as 14 August 2024, at the stipulated rate of 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment records gross sum of £957.99 (£687.72 plus shortfall of £270.27) for unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £958 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £763 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent ordered to pay unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £458 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,180
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.