Case 2402485/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Grist v Elite Linen Launderers North West Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402485/2022
- Decision date
- 20 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Grist
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 April 2023, the tribunal gave Mr J Grist an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because the proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Holmes struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination on the underlying wage claim and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By letter dated 26 April 2023 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the ground that the proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, and the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.