Case 2402486/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Nimmo v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402486/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Mrs L Heath, Mr P Dobson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Nimmo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool before Employment Judge Benson, sitting with Mrs L Heath and Mr P Dobson, over 11-15 and 18 October 2021. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The unanimous judgment of the Tribunal was that all claims failed and were dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all claims fail and are dismissed. No written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies Disability Discrimination. The judgment itself states that all claims fail and are dismissed, without setting out separate reasons. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.