Case 2402499/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J James (family member and representative) For the v Treeserv Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402499/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J James (family member and representative) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Treeserv Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation), failed to present a response by 23 June 2020 and did not attend the hearing on 15 October 2020. Employment Judge Johnson therefore determined the matter in the respondent's absence. The claimant, Mr B James, was represented by Ms J James.
The Tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded. No separate monetary award was made at this hearing because the Tribunal could not quantify the claim on the material then available. The judgment records that the claimant did not attend because of issues relating to his mental health, and that documentation supporting the figures claimed in section 8.2 of the claim form was not available to the Tribunal.
The Tribunal ordered the claimant to provide, by 12 November 2020, copies of documents supporting the figures in section 8.2 of the claim form, including the letter sent by the respondent following his resignation referred to by his representative. He was also ordered to provide a signed and dated witness statement explaining how he had calculated the figures claimed and why, in relation to the 'night allowance', he believed the respondent had claimed that allowance from the government. If he could not provide evidence for any item, he was required to say so expressly.
Once that information had been provided, the Tribunal said it would consider whether remedy could be determined without a further hearing; if not, the case would be listed for a one-hour remedy hearing on a date to be advised.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim succeeded on liability, but the Tribunal was unable to quantify the claim at this hearing because the claimant did not attend and the supporting documentation identified in section 8.2 of the claim form was not available. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.