Case 2402509/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Eastham v Greensill Capital Management Company (UK) Limited (in administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402509/2021
- Decision date
- 12 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Eastham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented. The tribunal found that the complaints by all four claimants, including Ms S Eastham, that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well-founded.
The tribunal held that all four claimants were entitled to a protective award. It recorded that the protected period began on 12 March 2021 and lasted for 90 days. The extracted text does not record a monetary sum for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint by all four claimants under section 188(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment was entered under Rule 21 because no response had been presented. The tribunal found the complaints well-founded and awarded a protective award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- section 188(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.