Case 2402512/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Jones v Norens Limited t/a Homecrest — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402512/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge made a determination of the claim on the papers and entered judgment for the claimant, Mr D Jones, against Norens Limited t/a Homecrest.
The tribunal held that Mr Jones was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £6,646.08, calculated using gross pay so as to reflect the likelihood that the sum would be treated as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal also found that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy, and that Mr Jones was entitled to a redundancy payment. Using 1 week’s pay for each complete year of service while aged between 22 and 41, the award was calculated as 19 x £553.84, producing £10,522.96.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had not paid 12 days of accrued untaken annual leave entitlement. It ordered payment of £946.84, calculated by reference to gross annual pay of £28,800 divided by 365 days and multiplied by 12 days. The judgment also included the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that the relevant decision day was 22 May 2023, the calculation day was 23 May 2023, and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum, but no separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £6,646 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment calculated as 1 week’s pay for each complete year of service while aged between 22 and 41. | Upheld | — | £10,523 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay accrued untaken annual leave entitlement of 12 days and ordered payment of the gross sum claimed. | Upheld | — | £947 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,116
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.