Case 2402518/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MS WINIFRED HENRY v Catherine’S Little Angels Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402518/2022
- Decision date
- 17 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MS WINIFRED HENRY
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing listed for 13 September 2022. The claimant had notified the tribunal that she was unable to attend because of ill health. Employment Judge Cline therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment on the papers.
The tribunal ordered payment on four heads of claim. It found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, described in the judgment as wrongful dismissal, and awarded damages of £2,160. It also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,700.
The judgment further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £144. It also found an unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to statutory sick pay and ordered payment of the net sum of £41.08. The judgment required payment within 14 days of the date the decision was sent to the parties. A separate notice stated that interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 would run from 17 September 2022 at 8% per annum if any sum remained unpaid after the 14-day period.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment stated that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, described as wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | £2,160 |
| Redundancy | The judgment found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,700 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment stated that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £144 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found an unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to statutory sick pay and awarded the net sum. | Upheld | — | £41 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,045
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.