Case 2402525/2024 · Employment Tribunal
J Williams v Sensible Group Holdings Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402525/2024
- Decision date
- 27 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, J Williams, presented the claim in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 29 April 2024. The respondent, Sensible Group Holdings Ltd, did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It awarded the claimant £571 gross in respect of that claim.
The judgment records that no award was made for holiday pay because there was no such claim on the claim form. The total amount payable to the claimant was £571.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 22. The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £571 gross. It also records that no award was made for holiday pay because there was no such claim on the claim form. | Upheld | — | £571 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £571
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.