Case 2402530/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Curran v LJ Cleaning Service (North West) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402530/2022
- Decision date
- 2 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Curran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 January 2023, the Tribunal gave Ms A Curran an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not informed the Tribunal that she had taken action to have the respondent company restored to the Register of Companies and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make any representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Holmes struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying employment issues and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim in the extracted text. It states only that 'the claim' was struck out because the claimant had not informed the Tribunal that she had taken action to have the respondent company restored to the Register of Companies and because the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.