Case 2402537/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Redmond v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402537/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hill REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Redmond
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied on 5 August 2019 for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 6 August 2019. The Tribunal refused the application because it found there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant's representative had confirmed at the preliminary hearing that the claims for pregnancy discrimination and direct discrimination on the grounds of disability were withdrawn. It referred to rules 51 and 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, under which a withdrawn claim or part of a claim comes to an end and the Tribunal issues a judgment dismissing it.
The Tribunal also noted that no representations had been made at the time of withdrawal about reserving a right to bring further claims or estoppel issues. It recorded the respondent's position that the original claims were separate causes of action, leaving the claimant's claim of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 still to be determined.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's representative confirmed at the preliminary hearing that the pregnancy discrimination claim was withdrawn; reconsideration of the judgment sent on 6 August 2019 was refused. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's representative confirmed at the preliminary hearing that the claim for direct discrimination on the grounds of disability was withdrawn; reconsideration of the judgment sent on 6 August 2019 was refused. A separate remaining claim of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was noted as still to be determined. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- section 15 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.