Case 2402551/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Hull v Wagon & Horses Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402551/2022
- Decision date
- 14 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Hull
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 5 October 2022 was cancelled.
On the papers, the tribunal awarded £1,076.92 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The judgment states that this was calculated as two weeks' salary, using an average weekly salary of £538.46.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,550.77. The judgment gives the calculation as £28,000 per annum divided by 52 weeks, then by 5 days, giving £107.69 per day, multiplied by 14.4 days. The notice on interest stated that interest would be payable if the sums were not paid within 14 days after the written record was sent, with the relevant decision day recorded as 14 October 2022 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Default judgment entered under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The award was for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars, calculated as two weeks' salary at £538.46 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,077 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment entered under rule 21. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded the calculated sum of £1,550.77 based on £28,000 annual salary, £538.46 weekly pay, £107.69 daily pay, and 14.4 days. | Upheld | — | £1,551 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,628
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.