Case 2402558/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Johnson v Allied Healthcare Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402558/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge Porter on 3 December 2019, found that there was no relevant service provision change within the meaning of the TUPE regulations. On that basis, the TUPE issue was resolved against the claimant.
The tribunal also found that Mrs D Johnson was dismissed by reason of redundancy. As a result, it awarded a redundancy payment of £7,840.00 and ordered Allied Healthcare Services Limited to pay that sum to the claimant.
Separately, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued holiday pay on termination of employment. It ordered payment of £640.00 gross in respect of that holiday pay. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found there was no relevant service provision change within the meaning of the TUPE regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £7,840.00. | Upheld | — | £7,840 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay accrued holiday pay on termination and ordered payment of £640.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,480
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.