Case 2402562/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Lamb v Park Bank Real Estates Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402562/2020
- Decision date
- 7 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Lamb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment following agreement between Mr A Lamb and Park Bank Real Estates Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement and that the order was in full and final settlement of the claimant's claim for damages for breach of contract arising from failure to pay employer's pension contributions, and for non-provision of a statement of employment particulars.
By consent, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,500 as damages for breach of contract. No liability findings on the merits were made, and the judgment does not record any separate award under other heads of loss.
The hearing was listed as a remote video hearing, and the note records that neither party objected to that format.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement in full and final settlement of the claimant's claim for damages for breach of contract for failure to pay employer's pension contributions, and for non-provision of a statement of employment particulars. The tribunal ordered payment of a gross sum of £2,500 by consent. | Settled | — | £2,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.