Case 2402569/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Bellamy v RG Recruitment Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402569/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Bellamy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Miss H Bellamy's claim against RG Recruitment Group Limited. The Employment Judge found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant's salary for February and March 2020.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £4,166.66, described in the judgment as the total sum due. The judgment was limited to the wages claim and did not include any separate monetary analysis beyond that award.
The judgment also states that it does not affect the claim in relation to pension contributions, indicating that issue was not determined by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent failed to pay the claimant's salary for February and March 2020 and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £4,166.66, described as the total sum due. | Upheld | — | £4,167 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,167
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.