Case 2402576/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Couzens v Sigmatex (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402576/2023
- Decision date
- 26 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Greer REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Couzens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by Employment Judge Greer on 15 and 16 June 2023. The claimant, Mr D Couzens, appeared in person by CVP and the respondent, Sigmatex (UK) Limited, was represented by Mrs Shaw, solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal by constructive dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. It also recorded that the claimant’s claim of wrongful dismissal by constructive dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. The written judgment does not set out the tribunal’s oral reasons, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Pursued as a claim of unfair dismissal by constructive dismissal. The tribunal found it was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Pursued as a claim of wrongful dismissal by constructive dismissal. The tribunal found it was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.