Case 2402600/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Anderson v ISM Bespoke Ltd (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402600/2021
- Decision date
- 23 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Anderson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Benson struck out Mr G Anderson's claim against ISM Bespoke Ltd (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation). The judgment records that, by letter dated 6 October 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to be actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not set out the underlying substantive claim type or any merits findings, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant did not make written representations, make sufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 6 October 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.