Case 2402602/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Liddle v J A Harrison & Co (Manchester) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402602/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Liddle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote video hearing at Liverpool on 12 April 2021 before Employment Judge Ord. The claimant, Mr S Liddle, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr A Williams, solicitor.
The only decision recorded in the written judgment is that the respondent's application to have the claim struck out was dismissed. The record does not contain findings on the merits of the underlying claim, and it notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
The judgment also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record only records that the Respondent's application to strike out the claim was dismissed. It does not record a substantive determination of the underlying unfair dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.