Case 2402609/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Steven Hughes v Mike Jones & Son Decorators Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2402609/2021
- Decision date
- 20 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr Appearances
- Venue
- Manchester Via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Steven Hughes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under Rule 21(2) after the respondent had been sent the claim form twice, did not enter a response, and did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant under oath and considered the payslips he provided, and was satisfied the claim could be determined in the respondent's absence.
It found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy, so his redundancy payment claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £14,795. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £5,040 net as damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,326 gross. The total sum awarded was £22,161, and the judgment stated that all sums due were to be paid gross without deduction for tax, with the claimant responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that might become due.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that the redundancy payment claim was well founded. | Upheld | — | £14,795 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the sum of £5,040 net. | Upheld | — | £5,040 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,326 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,326 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,161
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.