Case 2402618/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Douek v Meoros Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402618/2021
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms S Howarth, Mr P Dobson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms M Douek
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms M Douek, brought maternity discrimination claims against Meoros Ltd and Ms C Weisfish. The Tribunal heard the case at Manchester on 6 and 7 December 2022 before Employment Judge Phil Allen, Ms S Howarth and Mr P Dobson. It found that the first respondent had been dissolved on 16 November 2021, so the Tribunal could not hear or determine the claims against it.
The Tribunal unanimously held that the claimant was treated unfavourably because she had exercised the right to ordinary and additional maternity leave, contrary to section 18(4) of the Equality Act 2010, by the second respondent’s refusal to allow her to return to her tutor role in January or February 2021 and by dismissing her from employment without notice on 2 February 2021. That maternity discrimination claim against the second respondent succeeded.
A separate allegation that the second respondent failed to offer or discuss any suitable alternative role for the claimant did not succeed and was dismissed. The Tribunal also recorded that the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures did not apply to the circumstances of the dismissal, so no uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was awarded.
On remedy, the second respondent was ordered to pay £11,000 for injury to feelings, £1,002.96 for losses resulting from the discrimination, and interest of £1,622.58 on the injury to feelings award plus £73.86 on the losses award. The overall award therefore totalled £13,699.40.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was treated unfavourably because she had exercised the right to ordinary and additional maternity leave, contrary to section 18(4) of the Equality Act 2010, by the second respondent’s refusal to allow her to return to her tutor role in January or February 2021 and by dismissing her without notice on 2 February 2021. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £12,003 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The allegation that the second respondent failed to offer or discuss any suitable alternative role for the claimant was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,699
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,003
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 18(4) Equality Act 2010
- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.