Case 2402625/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Dass v Shanti Services Limited (in voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402625/2022
- Decision date
- 18 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker Representatives
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Dass
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Mr A Dass was not an employee or worker of Shanti Services Limited. On that basis, his claims could not succeed.
The claims for a redundancy payment, unpaid annual leave, unpaid wages and unpaid notice monies all failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was not an employee or worker of the first respondent and that the redundancy payment claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid annual leave and states the claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to unpaid wages and states the claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment refers to unpaid notice monies and states the claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.