Case 2402640/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mohammed Haris Thozhuparambil Kunjumohammed v Fuel Proof Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402640/2024
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fairhurst
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mohammed Haris Thozhuparambil Kunjumohammed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Manchester by CVP on 23 August 2024 before Employment Judge Fairhurst sitting alone. The claimant, Mr Mohammed Haris Thozhuparambil Kunjumohammed, appeared in person and the respondent, Fuel Proof Limited, was represented by its Managing Director, Mr Hargreaves.
The tribunal decided that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded. The claim was therefore dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was of unauthorised deductions from pay contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.