Case 2402642/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I C Ofoha v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402642/2024
- Decision date
- 2 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fearon REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I C Ofoha
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent as a radiologist from 16 November 2020 until 12 April 2021, when his employment was terminated on grounds of capability. He presented claims on 1 May 2024 for unfair dismissal, other payments and race discrimination.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have two years' service. It dismissed the unlawful deduction of wages / other payments claim because it found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought within the required time period and it was not brought in time.
For the race discrimination claim, the tribunal found that the claim was presented outside the applicable time limit. It found that the claimant's health did not prevent him from acting promptly, that he had made conscious decisions to prioritise other matters, and that the delay prejudiced the respondent's ability to investigate and gather evidence. The tribunal concluded it was not just and equitable to extend time, so the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the relevant two years' service to claim unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as an unlawful deduction of wages / other payments claim and dismissed it because it was not brought within the required time period, where it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the race discrimination claim was presented outside the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.