Case 2402664/2026 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the First and Third v For the Second Respondent: Mr C Ushieagu (Litigation Consultant) Mr C Lazarou (observing only) — 2026
- Case reference
- 2402664/2026
- Decision date
- 25 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the First and Third
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the interim relief hearing on 23 June 2026, the Tribunal found that Miss Ridgway was likely to succeed in her complaint against Moradia Limited that the principal reason for her dismissal was that she had made one or more protected disclosures. Her application for interim relief against Moradia Limited therefore succeeded. This was an interim decision rather than a final determination of the underlying claim.
As section 129(9)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applied, the Tribunal ordered continuation of the Claimant’s contract under section 130. The contract continues in force from 12 June 2026 until determination or settlement of the claim. Moradia Limited must pay £3,833.33 gross per month for the period from 13 June 2026, monthly in arrears on the 12th day beginning 12 July 2026; the Claimant is responsible for tax, National Insurance and employee pension contributions. She also remains entitled to wages due on 27 June 2026 for the period ending 12 June 2026. No fixed aggregate monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The outcome is limited to the successful application for interim relief against the First Respondent. The Tribunal found that the Claimant was likely to succeed in her complaint that the principal reason for dismissal was one or more protected disclosures; the underlying claim was not finally determined. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- likely to succeed threshold for interim relief
- section 129(9)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 130 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.