Case 2402684/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Broomhead v Peninsula Legal Services Limited t/a Irwell Law and 5 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402684/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
7 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claim because it found that it lacked jurisdiction to hear it due to judicial proceedings immunity. The written judgment records the outcome only, with reasons having been given orally at the hearing.
The claimant was ordered to pay costs of £2,000.00 to the first to fifth respondents towards the costs of the hearing, and £1,000.00 to the sixth respondent towards the costs of the hearing. The judgment does not record any remedy award to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claim because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to judicial proceedings immunity. It does not set out detailed findings because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claim because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to judicial proceedings immunity. It does not set out detailed findings because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- judicial proceedings immunity
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.