Case 2402694/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs I Earl v The Highland Drove Inn Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402694/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs I Earl
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Leach decided that a determination could properly be made on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs I Earl's wages. It ordered The Highland Drove Inn Limited to pay the claimant the gross sum of £373.33.
The written record also contained the standard notice on tribunal interest under article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. That notice stated that interest would be payable if the award remained unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, but no separate interest sum was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and the tribunal made a determination on the papers. | Upheld | — | £373 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £373
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.